Part 1: Introduction
The precise description of historical and national events in the American society has integrated the book to review and provide real-time data and information on the occurrence of 1761-1845 political developments. Mainly, the books author, Lynn Hudson Parsons, understood the dynamics in the elections of the American society; hence, the presentation of seminal work for the major political figures involved in the events. Andrew Jacksons political biography is included in the book to reflect the involvements that connoted the emergence of such a force in the political history of the 19th century. Subsequently, the events that took place in the presidential contest between the once an American president, John Quincy Adams and A. Jackson are tallied by the nature of the results and as received and tabulated by the commissioned authorities. The study summarizes the historical issues contextualized in the book while critically contesting to show the extent of which the author was precise, descriptive, and incisive in relating the political events to the books topic; The Birth of Modern Politics 1828.
Part 2: Content report of book
The book anticipates that the role of Andrew Jackson in territorial and civil wars as a Major General influenced his popular role to contest against the English aristocrat and a serving president, John Quincy Adams. As forces of change in the rights of individual citizens to engage in the voting process, the book reviews the role of the popular vote to change the course of declaring the winning presidential candidate in the year 1828. The course of inclusion for the citizens in the voting process seems to have been subject to the ethnicity and opinion polling functionalities.
The informative discussion asserts that the existence of political propagandists changed the support for either the democrat or republican candidate. Despite the availability of many installments in the nature that an American president would be elected into office, the information embraces the 1828 elections as the first democratic elections in the country since its independence in the mid-18th century. Since the incumbent president was an aristocrat, the need for the nation to elect a person whose endeavors thrived in the facets of democracy were inevitable.
Part 3: Analysis of the book
The author clarifies the input of the elite groups and post-war heroes in creating a framework that would revolutionize the course of politics for the benefit of the majority Americans. Similarly, the book reviews the requirements for the implementation of fund-raising and campaign kits to overcome the financial constraints that barred the viable candidates from the presidential race. The process of policy making through the electoral process or the house takes a particular model, which incepts the role of the Congress, the popular vote, the electors council, and commissioners for the Democrats and more evaluated choice of the president.
Critical analysis of the book
Critically, changes in the American political structure were gradual since the nation had become independent in the 18th century. However, the idea of equitable democracy steered the recurrence of revolutions with civil and ethnic integrations in the event of excessive racial and economic concerns. As the research asserts that the key policies in the 1828 elections process and culture were the ultimate decisions, there are certain challenges accrued in authors decision-making process. For instance, the country is made of 28 states, and only 24 admit the new political system as all have different interests and different economic values. The argument is that the author makes three decisions involving the history and fundamentals of the American political culture to define that indeed the changes were accomplished within a period of four years (1824-1828).
The establishment of the 1828 election process and the fact that a temperamental individual and a former military general would succeed to power over a rich and prominent aristocrat revolutionized the thought of the democracy and aristocracy in the countrys politics. The policy helped in addressing challenges in over 24 states of the United States. The co-decision process relied on consultation to political experts to present their final declaration of who had succeeded to become the countrys president. Similarly, the professional author presents with knowledge related to the current political circumstances, which helps to establish and implement the best policies for the 1828 legislative changes.
Part 4: Peer evaluation
The books perspective on the birth of politics in the American modernism culture caters for the constitutional provisions to every citizens voting rights, power sharing, and equitable distribution of socio-economic resources. The book further highlights the policy of setting decisions, which could show and present the correct grievances of the mainstream citizens. On the contrary, it is realistic that racial and class differences existed and were evident in the modern and post-modern cultures of the American society.
In turn, the book serves to apply solutions of forecasting any negative issues that a Democratic candidate could face. In the description, the process involved the incorporation of the different American states from the southern agricultural and northern industrial orientations to economic growth. The problem as to whether Americans could elect a president based on ideologies rather than the personal attributes of economic power and popularity are clear in the 1828 contest. The unpopular Andrew Jackson becomes the indispensable contestant to defeat the wealthy and popular aristocrat, John Quincy Adams. Therefore, all states gradually embraced and enforced the contribution of the political system via the establishment of policies that would provide remedies to equitable democracy. It is evident that the parties provided a good strategy of leadership in tackling the campaigning obstacles faced by candidates in the 18th-century campaigns of the American society.
In using the book for historical insights, scholars should assess the presence of clarified reviews on the socio-political and geopolitical aspects that prevailed at the time compared with the previous or the succeeding circumstances. For example, the number of cases and political players complicates the process of establishing the essence of the authors decision that the period marked the implementation of democracy. Secondly, the prolonged period of the acquisition of equitable rights and right to vote to convince one to contest against the authors notion of freedom. Apparently, the slavery period lasted through this political era, and the minorities were subjected to harsh forms of suppression in case of any revolt towards antislavery.
Historians should also question the economic influence in politics of the USA according to the book, to clarify its authenticity. For instance, the financial differences between the southern and northern states presented a crisis in the funding of the campaigns, which affected the number of candidates to contest in the elections. Because some states claimed to implement the political measures, the cases were not supposed to imply that the political course had changed to include democracy for the socio-political conglomerates. The challenges emanate from the fact that the book revolves a few political figures instead of the majority factors needed to approve that these 19th-century changes influenced the political system to change entirely.
Parsons, Lynn H. The Birth of Modern Politics: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, and the Election of 1828. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Internet resource.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal:
- Comparison of the Life in Texas between 1920s and 1980s
- US History Myths
- Globalization and the State
- Amnesty for Undocumented Immigrants
- Disaster Law and Emerging Issues in Brazil
- Factors That Led to the End of the Cold War
- How Did English Colonists Create an Economy Based on Slavery? - Research Paper