Thoreau and Chief Seattle respected, loved and marveled at the uniqueness and serenity that nature had to offer to the people. They became part of nature; they were among the animals, birds and tree of nature because nature was significant to them than everything in their line of duty. They did not take from nature but gave back nature, to enhance its continuity. Thoreau and Chief Seattle valiantly fought using their thoughts about for the sanctity of nature to be unperturbed by heartless whites and other careless beings. Thoreau purports that the fountain of intelligence is in the morning. A thought shared by Chief Seattle when he concurs that Thoreau and Chief Seattle man is connected with nature and all things he does are connected too (). Both these have developed some conscious relationship with nature in favor for its continuity.
Chief Seattle speaks passionately of the qualities that natures confer, of the wind and the tranquility it bestows a quiet ambience, of the birds and their natural symphony, of the leaves crushing sounds during spring and of the crackle of insects wings. Thoreau is also an affectionate of nature he precisely and zealously bespeaks of the gratification derived from nature. He as the Seattle, marvels at the swish of mosquitoes at dawn, he is puzzled at night when he looks deep in the sky and see the beautiful constellation above, the birds in their multitudes have become his allies , even the wild birds and the wonder and peacefulness that wing brings is exalted by him.
Nature was the abode of these two profound nature lovers. The quiet that nature offered was something applauded by both men. Chief Seattle decries the hustle and bustle of the city life and all the noise it has brought with. Thoreau left the so-called civilization and went to seek the purity of nature. He went to simplify his life and truly live for a purpose is the one in a million people who live for a divine or poetic purpose. Both men seemed attached to the preservation of nature as it is. Thoreau is excited by the prospect of buying Hallowell farm, because nature is evident in the farm. The hollow trees bitten by rabbits and the rocks all bespeak of nature and the fact that it was far from the village but he thought the village was far from such unfathomable beauty. Chief Seattle on the other hand wishes that the quality of nature be retained (Seattle, 156). He wants horses to remain untamed, wishes that buffaloes are not killed for mans economic gain, he dreads to see a sky without the wise eagles, he fears that the cradle of mans survival technique, hunting, is under threat and wishes it not. Both men concede that being in nature is what is can be correctly described as living and those that are without nature are just surviving.
These two men had different form of satisfaction that they drew from nature. To Chief Seattle land was sacred. Each parcel of land held some significant holiness to it. He considered nature as an extension of his family that was to treated and tendered with care abundance. The Chief respects nature because it confers the right to held by him passed down from his ancestors who are now buried in nature. Seattle opines that survival of man is tagged on the existence of beasts in nature without which he purports that men will perish. A view quite eloquent as the beasts of nature nourishes the body of a man and enables him to live. The history that is buried in nature means a lot for Chief. The great deeds of long men still ring the air of nature and ought to be remembered (Seattle, 100). To him nature is the archive of epochal events and momentous occasions that left an important mark on the community and the generation to come will have the opportunity to share in these moments posthumously.
Contrary to Seattle view nature on its inherent sacredness, Thoreau saw nature using the telescopes of philosophy. He is quite convinced that nature is the fountain of knowledge any operate who claims to be wise must be aware nature. Thoreau as a philosopher and poet of repute draws the nutrition for his imagination from the observing the events of nature; the events that unfolds in the positive way of life, and the event that proclaims the good deeds as dictated by nature. Thoreau purports that living in the neighbor of nature and discerning its dynamics is tantamount to surely living dear, living the life intended by the greater good and sucking all the juice that life had to offer as well as enjoying all what nature offers by herself. He wants nature be preserved and does not see the need of improvements done by men in the name of improvements for these improvements harm men before they satiate other mens desires. Thoreau has shared the aspect that we are naturally wise and he considers himself even wiser before when he was born. It could be true that nature confers the ultimate wisdom but civilized education just ruins us.
The ownership of nature was so much sacred to these two men. According to Chief Seattle, nature differs from one aspect to the other; nature bare different fruits, which he was, convinced not the same way the white man reasons. The ownership of nature was hereditary; we obtain lands from our grandparents. In addition, Seattle valued the protection of nature; as much as the whites could view nature as their enemy, he considered it a brother (Thoreau, 205). On the other hand, Thoreau considers nature as a religion owned from the ancestors, he woke up early in the morning and bath in the bond generated from nature (Thoreau, 115).
These two men have a sense of attachment to nature that is admirable. Their desire to live and protect nature is overwhelming and should be applauded. Although they draw different utilities from nature, their ideologies converge at the intersection of conserving and preserving the essence of nature. They fight for nature due to the benefits they obtain from it as well as the urge to keep the religion as dictated by the ancestors. They would want a nature that glooms in its natural perspectives, they could love to shun those whites who do not have mercy and does not know how significant nature is and above all, they could practice nature to ensure its continuity in all perspectives.
Chief Seattle. Letter to President Pierce, 1855. The Norton Reader, Shorter 13th Edition. Ed. Linda Peterson, John Brereton, Joseph Bizup, Anne Fernald, Melissa Goldthwaite. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 299. Print.
Thoreau, Henry David. Where I Lived, and What I Lived For. The Norton Reader, Shorter 13th Edition. Ed. Linda Peterson, John Brereton, Joseph Bizup, Anne Fernald, Melissa Goldthwaite. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 635643. Print.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal:
- What Was the Total Impact of World War One? - Informative Essay Example
- Expository Essay on Causes of World War II: U.S Adversaries and the Use of Atomic Bombs
- Individual Evaluation and Reflective Essay
- Using Reading and Writing to Learn In an Environment Rather Than a Classroom
- The Development of Jazz in America
- Critical Essay Sample on Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci
- Struggle for Civil Rights