Family Code of Ethics

3 pages
636 words
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

This paper focuses on the family code of ethics as defined by defined by the World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations (WANGO). The family is an integral part of the society. It has an entitlement to protection by the state given the significance it plays. By protection, there are codes of ethics put in place that define the functioning of the family as well as its protection (Thiroux & Krasemann, 1980). One of the fundamental principles of the family is the value of life. The value of life, in this case, is considered as one of the strong pillars of a family. The other principle evident in the family code of ethics is truth telling or honesty. Telling of truth or honesty is broad and entails faithfulness and fidelity issues. This principle mainly defines the relationship between spouses (Thiroux & Krasemann, 1980). Faithfulness is a primary need in any relationship. Spouses are expected to respect each other. The other principle is goodness or rightness, which is captured by living for each other. Family members have a duty to serve each other and give priority to one anothers needs. Through this, the members of the family will develop maturity and respect one another. Thus, family members need to learn the art of unconditionally helping each other without expecting anything in return. This principle mainly will define the relationship between siblings and ensure that the relationship grows stronger. This ensures that individuals good and respectful towards each other (Thiroux & Krasemann, 1980).

Trust banner

If this sample essay on"Family Code of Ethics" doesn’t help,
our writers will!

The other principles in the family code of ethics as defined by the World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations (WANGO) include thoughts, words, deeds, greater purpose and potentiality in a relationship. The other principle in a family entails forgiveness and reconciliation. Individuals or family members should be in a position to compromise on each others position. Therefore, family members need to forgive and forget (Thiroux & Krasemann, 1980).

The addition of the other principles indeed is an improvement over humanitarian ethics. Humanitarianism entails the practice of saving lives and reducing or minimizing of suffering (Hall, 2011). It mainly relates to the emergency response, especially in the face of disasters, either man-made or natural. Having these additional principles ensures improvement in humanitarian ethics as they help to define how the humanitarian aspect of the family comes out (Hall, 2011). By having a greater purpose, individuals are in a position to protect the family members and have strong ties between them. This implies that individuals look and see beyond their personal needs, and see the larger picture of the family at the core. By having the principle of greater purpose in a family, there is an improvement over humanitarian ethics as it ensures physical protection and bodily survival of individuals (Thiroux & Krasemann, 1980; Hall, 2011).

The additional principle of action is also instrumental in the humanitarian ethics. Action in this sense includes the words, thoughts and deeds of individuals. Actions taken by individuals need to be inclusive and take into consideration the consequences. Proper actions within the family set-up ensure there is dignity principle, and every other person in the family is respected in fullness (Thiroux & Krasemann, 1980). The additional principles also propagate the equality principle. The principle entails radical equality of impartiality, responding in instances where there is a need and ensuring non-discrimination in the practices. The additional principles also instill trust and confidence in individuals. By instilling trust, there is neutrality as far as the freedom of operational access is concerned. Additionally, the principles help define the autonomy of operations of individuals in the society while being respectful at the same time. Therefore, individuals can make their choices, which are respected (Thiroux & Krasemann, 1980).


Hall, S. M. (2011). Exploring the ethical everyday: An ethnography of the ethics of family consumption. Geoforum, 42(6), 627-637.

Thiroux, J. P., & Krasemann, K. W. (1980). Ethics: Theory and practice. Glencoe Publishing Company.

If you want discreet, top-grade help, order a custom paper from our experts.

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal: