Nonverbal communication refers to the use of visual signals like body language, detachment, and physical structure and appearance. It is the bodily response to voice or touch. Nonverbal communication encompasses the conscious and unaware processes of generating data through facial expressions, signals, and positions, and the clarification of the information from the received impressions from prior experiences. This paper details nonverbal communication and its use in passing judgment as to whether one is guilty or not. It also highlights various cultural, race and gender issues that may make the nonverbal cues be interpreted differently, and thus affect the final verdict in criminal investigations.
Interpreting nonverbal signals involves coordinating the bodily movements, eye movements and body posture. Between 60% and 70% of all communication made between two individuals is passed through physique language. 35% to 45% of this similar communication is passed in the nature of voice. Spoken word carries less than 10%. Thus, it should be undeniably without doubt that an investigator ought to be apprehensive with the subjects nonverbal replies. These inaudible signs may deliver more evidence than his or her audible responses (Hargrave 2008)
To be able to interpret nonverbal communication means determining how the responded reacts to interrogations that he or she does not find intimidating. For instance, responding to enquiries concerning ones name, social security number, or birth date ought not to be stressful, presumptuous that they are not endeavoring to cover their individuality. Other questions about the presence in a crime scene, being in possession of stolen property, or having firearms in ones residence will assist the investigator to establish the subjects nonverbal behavior in both frightening and non-frightening situations.
Non-verbal conduct exposes itself through the positioning of the body, eye contact, movements, and facial expressions. While evaluating verbal responses comprises of being aware of the tone, volume or speech, interpreting nonverbal reactions involves instituting a norm. The pattern should be used in evaluating the following: How the subject maintains eye contact when talking to the investigator, observing the changes in body position about the questions asked, how fast/ slow the subject response to the queries, and how he/ she uses hands and gestures while answering (Willen, Leif A, and Strmwell, 2010).
It is possible to use nonverbal cues to determine whether one is lying or not. The conscious and unconscious awareness respond distinctly. Telling a lie and concurrently endeavoring to regulate several various gestures, reactions and other physical manners suggestive of lying is almost unmanageable for the unexperienced conscious mind. The signals that an investigator looks for tend to show themselves when the claimant subconsciously experiences the maximum stress levels, emanating from the anxiety that the detective may sense their lies. This amplified stress prompts betraying conducts.
When lying, the timing and period of emotional signs and emotions are expressed in the usual way. The exhibition of feeling is either delayed, takes longer it would in a normal situation, then breaks unexpectedly. In some cases, the facial expressions may not match the statement made verbally. For instance, the narrator may show mixed emotions of fear instead of being teary as most people would do when narrating about a carjacking scenario he/ she had participated in. Several individuals while lying, do not express their feelings whole. The expressions are only restricted to mouth movements instead of involving the whole face. A remorseful person grows defensive when the interrogator dwells on an issue directly affecting them. An innocent person confronted with the same circumstance often comfortable with the questioning and does not show signs of remorse. Facial expressions may seem artificial or deferred in reaction to a question. A person who elevates his eyebrows in amazement, or grins devoid of raising the eyebrows may be forging this performance to disguise true sentiments. It is particularly significant to watch for the effectiveness of these signals as they will characteristically not be timely when pretentious.
Nonverbal conduct, which is maybe used to may show deception comprise the following: Breaking of eyes contact involving covering them, staring at the floor or other objects for a considerable amount of time. Some subjects begin activities that delay answers like looking at their watch, adjusting a tie or glasses or even picking fluff off their clothes. When lying, the body builds up stress, which in turn intensifies the flow of blood to the nose and ears. It is very usual for the subject to pull or touch his/ her ears and nose, which makes the ears appear outstandingly reddish. The lying individual tends to cross his or her arms or legs across the tummy while directing his legs on the side of the interrogator. This unconscious mind tries to keep a safe distance between them. Additionally, the subject tends to shake the foot, tap his toes, and swing his legs or bounce the lap through traumatic demands.
It is however quite challenging to detect these activities when the interrogator does not see the respondents whole body. It is, therefore, crucial that he ensures the subjects full body can be accessed. Preferably, to achieve the maximum out of nonverbal communication, the conversation region should be calm, reserved, and without of interruptions such as open windows and numerous substances on tables or desks. The subject is not supposed to pick anything from the interrogating area like pens or paper pins, which permits them to become unfocused as interruptions make it more challenging for the investigator to evaluate their behavior. For the interviewer to access whether the subject is lying or not, he/ she should face him/ her, with a 3 to 4 feet distance between them, with no obstacles.
The ability to detect a lie is not a very problematic ability to obtain; preparation is principal. The competence to extricate deception can be significantly heightened by the sorts of inquiries you make, the technique you use to test them and how you present the questions to the claimant. In fact, the capability to persuade the respondent that he or she ought not to lie is the first step in preparation for a successful investigation. Apparently, by someone displaying one or more of the above-mentioned habits does not mean that they are telling a lie which means that relying on nonverbal signs may not be 100% reliable. It is paramount for investigators to make use of other cues to establish whether the subject is telling a lie or not.
Numerous scientific data has been collected in support that nonverbal communication can be sufficiently used to determine guilt or innocence. In the study of how people pass information across nonverbally, the limbic mind is where the deed takes place. This is because the portion of the brain that responds to the world around us automatically and immediately, in actual time, and without hesitation. There is confirmation that the nonverbal indications made from an individual to another one do not exclusively have anything to do with surroundings.
Other than signs, phenotypic personalities can also express explicit messages in nonverbal communication, for example, eye shade, hair pigment, and stature. Prior research concerning height has widely established that taller persons are seen as being more remarkable. Perillo, Jennifer and Saul a sample of executives in the USA and discovered that elevation was a crucial feature in determining promotion or demotion CITATION Per10 \l 1033 (Perillo, Jennifer, & Saul M. Kassin, 2010). Height can have advantages and downsides as well in passing judgments concerning whether a person is innocent or not. Whereas big folks time and again command more reverence than small people, height can as well be disadvantageous to some features of one-to-one communication. For example, in the event where an investigator wishes to have an eye-to-eye conversation with a person and do not wish to be supposed as too big for his/ her boots.
Ethnicity, race, and gender play a significant part in nonverbal communication, and they are the facets that help to impact how education undertakings are systematized. In many Native American Societies, for instance, there is repeatedly a stress on nonverbal communication, which is very valued methods by which youngsters learn. In this logic, education is not entirely reliant on verbal communication; relatively, it is nonverbal communication which acts as a chief means of not only establishing relational connections, but also the transmission of cultural morals, and families learn how to contribute to this arrangement from an early age.
There are ethnic, race and gender disparities that play a major role in nonverbal communication. The use and connotations of body gestures, eye contact, facial expressions and touch differ provisional to the values and gender of the correspondent. For instance, thumbs up may indicate being okay in America, while in the Indian community, it may be an indication of a discomfort. Paralanguage fluctuates by beliefs and gender while cultural, and gender disparities occur in the three-dimensional norm. Moreover, self-presentation in positions of form and use of time fluctuates with culture and gender. For example, the Muslim community dresses in Hijabs, while the Christians dressing is varied. An investigator may easily draw conclusions based on the dressing. A lady dressed in a fitting trouser is more susceptible to be involved in crime than one dresses in a long maxi dress. In a scene where a crime involves people of a certain color, it is highly likely that the investigators will question individuals of that particular color. For instance, in an event where people caught selling drugs, black people are more likely to be asked than white people. On the other hand, less technical crimes involving hacking would be associated with white people.
Non-verbal communication is an exceptionally intricate yet essential part of complete communication skills though, most individuals are frequently entirely oblivious of their nonverbal conduct. A basic consciousness of nonverbal communication approaches, over and overhead what is essentially supposed, can aid in improving communication with other people. Awareness of these cues can be used to hearten people to be more expressive about their anxieties and can lead to a better collective understanding, which is, after all, the goal of communication.
BIBLIOGRAPHY Hargrave, J. (Director). (2008). Nonverbal communication and body language[(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X7fKZTmZa4)
Perillo, Jennifer, T., & Saul M. Kassin. (2010). Inside interrogation: The lie, the bluff, and the false confession law and human behavior . New York: Prentice Hill.
Willen, R. M., Leif A, & Strmwell. (2010). Inside criminal minds: offenders strategies when lying. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. New York.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal: