Problem Solving Case Study on Performance Appraisal

2021-12-15 19:06:01
2 pages
346 words
Categories: 
University/College: 
University of California, Santa Barbara
Type of paper: 
Case study
logo_disclaimer
This essay has been submitted by a student.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Central Problem in Case Study

There are two issues I see in this case, first I disagree with peer evaluations. If at any point you had an issue with a co-worker, that could sway their judgment on your evaluation. Second, the evaluation of Mr. Taft by Mr. Fryer. Fryer should have excused himself from the evaluation if he could not be fair. He worked closely with Taft prior to this assignment. Mr. Singh has the same qualifications as Taft but has more tenure with the company. Due to Singh's work and his tenure he should have received the same or better than Taft.

If this sample essay on"Problem Solving Case Study on Performance Appraisal" doesn’t help,
our writers will!

How to Avoid a Problem?

The issues could have been avoided if the company had been doing the evaluations prior to the moves. It also could have been done differently by allowing the former department heads to evaluate the employees prior to the change of position. This would have been more fair and impartial.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Peer Evaluations in the Appraisal Process

The way I see it peer evaluations have the advantage of having it done by a person, with whom they work closely. The work performance would be more observed by a co-worker than a supervisor. I am not saying a supervisor is negligent, but they have to observe all employees not just one. The employees work closely with one another on a day-to-day basis. This allows them to observe both good and bad attributes.

What Can Be Done to Resolve the Problem With Marcus Singh?

I believe that his evaluation should be completed by his prior supervisor and re-submitted. This would be a fair assessment and he may feel better about the evaluation. I also think Mr. Tafts should be completed again, by his prior supervisor to compare them. Mr. Fryer, I believe, let his personal knowledge and history with Taft cloud his judgment on the evaluations. If the evaluations are found to be in error the company should then decide whether or not to back-pay Singh for the miss giving and whether to dock the wages of Mr. Taft.

notification
If you want discreet, top-grade help, order a custom paper from our experts.

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal: