Basic needs are insatiable and can sometimes develop habitually from the influence of others. It becomes difficult to satisfy ones need as much as goods may be available. Even when one is rich, they tend to develop acquisition of other goods in order to satisfy their need (Kasser, et al). This aspect has brought the idea of capitalism in which a combined force is deployed to ensure that more goods and services are produced for human satisfaction. In addition, great efforts have accompanied the production of goods for sustainability.
Capitalism provides sufficient goods in the economy. Human work so hard in order to buy the goods produced as a result of capitalism. It is evidenced that no other economic system is able to produce enough goods that can satisfy the needs of the whole population. As much as capitalism infringes the financial position of the population, people make great efforts to ensure there is acquisition of these goods (Kasser, et al).
The need for desirability is continuous and one still desire more than they have. This insatiability of individual intertwines with the insatiability of capitalism since the economy cannot produce enough goods that can satisfy every individual. Therefore, the insatiable nature of goods is not inevitable; it requires a change in thinking and a belief in oneself for individual sustainability.
Basic need can sometime cause dissatisfaction in the life time of a human being. Education system usually generates an enormous dissatisfaction a cross human life (Kasser, et al). As much as a liberal education will facilitates a broad understanding and ability to make decisions towards specific issues, it consumes a lot of time. Most of the education systems do not indicate a vision to a good life but rather provides an eye to individuals to evaluate the markets and decide on the best strategy that can lead to a good life. Not even one man can control the decisions generated by factors for education.
These factors usually control their actions, those of sensing as well as grasping other options as provided by the history. This aspect of freedom leads to achievement that underlies different practice that defines a persons world. In addition, the education aspect should be an appealing essence of good life; that an individual should vie education as a tool that generates good life rather than gaining knowledge. Knowledge is not enough to facilitate the good admirable lives someone would admire; it requires a life of understanding aspects that contributes to the good life in question.
Transformation of the world to a better place and good life starts form individuals perspective (Kasser, et al). The very people who benefits from the good lives are the immediate people to make the best life they enjoy most. Most people believe that the transformation begins to a higher rank which is not the case; it is the efforts of individuals to ensure that they create the good life they want. This is possible through hard work and attaining relevant education that is crucial in making staunch decisions. The democratic principle of good life requires that no force can sustain it unless it is the decision of a person. It is true that only liberal educated consumers are the only hope of subordinating capitalism to human expectations of the good life.
It is evidenced that material goods can satisfy our needs up to a limit above which they make little or no different to the better lives of individuals. Most of the individuals find it critical to fall below the limit due to capitalism that works against the good lives. Capitalism requires an individual to engage in duties that makes small level of contribution to the better lives. Apart from supplying for the basic necessity to an individual, capitalism also urges us to believe that a good life involves accumulating material possessions (Kasser, et al).
Besides, economic instability has been the most dangerous effect of capitalism. This aspect of increasing production without profits is considered as directionless aspect towards achieving better life among the individuals. As a matter of fact, production of goods should aim at satisfying the economy in question rather than aiming at mass production. This aspect of capitalism is associated with the vice to greed and acquisitiveness that concentrates more goods. These piled goods divert our understanding on the good life since an individual does not know what goods to use and those not to use.
Capitalism can therefore be maintained as an economic means of production to ensure that an individual gets the good life deserved. Through deployment of various legislative measures that allows income not necessarily from employment, individuals could work less but attain the life required. In addition, imposing heavy tax on goods produced and strong restriction on advertisement, the consumption will be much reduced in the economy. Therefore, fewer goods should be consumed in the economy hence stable capitalism.
Kasser, Tim Ed, and Allen D. Kanner. Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. American Psychological Association, 2004.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal:
- Pros and Cons for Price Change Initiation
- Work-Related Stress Among Employees
- The Greek Economy Growth Rates
- The Impact of SPSS on Processed Food Comparative Study
- Tasks to Improve Employee Relations
- The Global Economic Situation and Uruguay Economic Raises
- Informative Essay Sample on Japans Economic Bubble