Critical Essay Sample on George Orwells Book 1984

Introduction

Many people think of 1984 as a science of narrative novel, but the only thing that the item is all about would almost lead one to think that it is allegedly positioned in the future. According to George Orwell, the book offers a thought on an inspiring learning experience for students in high school. It gives some challenging reading on some exciting themes on solitude, isolation, social class disparity, repression, abuse of power among other inspiring themes to enable them to have or develop their own opinions about today’s society. This is very crucial to the current world as it makes it a vibrant choice for high school readers who have their future at hand whether as the coming leaders or just as followers. It further depicts a world of control and influence using people against themselves as hostages given neither the opportunities nor the encouragement to think or read.

If this sample essay on"Critical Essay Sample on George Orwells Book 1984" doesn’t help,
our writers will!

Trust an expert

What Is the Theme of George Orwells Book 1984?

Orwell’s book portrays an attitude over no or less feeling for the yet to come years and the transposition of the book is much of physical than chronological. He exposes a protagonist Winston Smith getting into his depressing apartment conveying the dreary tone of the book with a description of the filthy living conditions around the apartment and imagines no different depravities, for instance, his habits are all foreseen in no drugs but an invention of some new differences. In his difficulties of anger, Orwell overlooks the qualities human beings have. All his characters are, in one way or another, puny or brutal, or dishonest, or unwise, or disgusting.

He had an idea of Britain to have gone through a revolution same as the Russian and would have gone through all the stages of development. At the beginning of the story, it is brought clear that television which was coming into existence by then served as a great value and means of indoctrination of the people and for the sets that could not be turned off. This was a great contribution to the technology as it served as a two-way thing in that people were forced to hear and see the screen so that they themselves could be heard and seen all times under supervision. Hence, the meaning of Big Brother is watching you keeping them under great control. This, therefore, means watching all times and others doing the watch narrowly for the great development.

Conflict Theory in George Orwells 1984

Orwell was not in a position to consider computers or else would have placed every being under surveillance. According to him, tyranny and computers do not go hand in hand, and the most computerized states currently are the least tyrannical in nature. He lacks the insight or invention of small changes. Then, too, Orwell had the technophobic that any technological advance is a slide downhill. This, for instance, exposes his attitude that the good-looking paper warranted to be written on with an actual point instead of being scratched with an ink pencil. This is, however, precisely the reverse of the truth.

Orwell imagines no different depravities, for instance, his habits are all foreseen in no drugs but an invention of some new differences. In his difficulties of anger, Orwell overlooks the qualities human beings have. All his characters are, in one way or another, puny or brutal, or dishonest, or unwise, or disgusting. Orwell’s book shows how state power and control suppresses individuality, choice, and freedom. Human beings in these texts do not give them value on socio-political power but rather as functional mechanisms of the state. He utilizes the protagonists who entirely are unsuccessful and reject society’s structures and rebel against them. Winston, for instance, is tortured and broken to the point where he loves Big Brother at the end of the novel, the challenge to his power throughout the film has only strengthened his control over the people.

The novel was developed out of boisterous settings in the inter-war period by economic and political instability inflation and unemployment. The nation was a scarred one in an aftermath of the German loss. Technological innovations were growing tremendously expounded by industrialists; class struggles and economic stability were dominant during the era the novel has been termed for sacrificing plot for a political message. Apart from being simple and having undeveloped characters, it also errands exploration of issues touching humanity over complexity and depth of characterization.

Connections Between George Orwells 1984 and Today

Orwell describes the situation that will creep into the life of many people living in that day and age, he describes the coming of a totalitarian rule. The novel gives an analogy of a world taken over by a certain individual, the people who get things done the way they want. In a world where humanity is controlled and always under a microscope, the aspect of freedom and liberty will be swapped for a controlled world. The freedom of speech and liberties pertaining to the media, government offices, and decision-making by people in power will all be controlled. It brings out the picture of a doomed world where repression and enslavement of humanity will be a way of life. The fact of the matter is technology is doom to society, with technological advancement increasing by the day so does freedom and free will escape humanity.

The media control what people see and hear, perceptions about the ruling techniques imposed in other states like the Soviet Union are controlled through the depiction of a dysfunctional ruling and the oppression of people. The thought patterns of people are controlled, people lack their opinion, and most are influenced by supporting or opposing certain ideologies. This influence comes into life through what people read in the papers or what they see on television. Personal opinions are not put into consideration, people are modeled to do what Big Brother thinks is right. When all of humanity does what the big brother wants then all is well. It is only through the acquisition of knowledge and shunning complacency can the future be redeemed. The right to education and opposition to bad policies will bring the rebirth of free will and liberty. The book is like a forecast of the future, change is necessary, and it should be effected immediately.

Conclusion

Orwell’s book most evidently does not mean to be stark of denial but it presents itself as a late actualization of classic reality, and if good postmodernism is to be like a windowpane as he puts, then nothing can stop him from being placed in the rank of other writers. He expounds the very concept of transparency within a set of powers to depict some sense of truth among nations. This effect, however, places the audience in a position able to get their own views over today’s society. In summary George Orwell in 1984 engaged in a personal dispute rather than an attempt to forecast the future. He did not have a fictional thought of foreseeing a plausible future and in the actual fact in all cases is the world of 1984 bearing no relation to the real world of the 1980s.