The term product liability is used to describe a situation where a manufacturer or a seller, is held accountable for offering a defective good to a customer. The seller of a faulty product is always held accountable for all injuries that the product may cause to a user. In the US, most of the claims associated with product liability are those linked with negligence, breach of warranty and strict liabilities. This essay is a discussion, analysis and a critique of the politics of product liability.
Discussion of Politics of Product Liability
In the United States, most product liability laws are created at the state level. The laws vary widely between different states. Every form of product liability claim requires differing elements to be proved so as to present a successful claim. Numerous states have developed comprehensive statutes covering products liability. The statutory provisions of such statutes are extremely diverse in such a way that the government has promulgated an Act for voluntary use by the States. The Act is referred as the Model Uniform Products Liability Act (MULPA). At the moment, there are no federal products liability laws in the United States.
Analysis of Politics of Product Liability
Forms of Defects
There are three forms of defects that consumers must prove to exist during a products liability case. The defects include manufacturing defects, design defects and warning defects CITATION Har10 \l 1033 (Strongman, 2010). In a case, the consumer is mandated to prove that a defect existed in the manufacturing process that made the products unsafe for use. Design defects characterize all products, both goods, and services, that are inadequately planned and so unreasonably hazardous to users CITATION Har10 \l 1033 (Strongman, 2010). A product liability claim based on warning defects arises when the claimant proves that the manufacturer did not put any label or offer instructions on using a hazardous product. Such a defect must have been discovered after the product was sold.
There are various defenses that are available in the product liability claims. Such defenses vary widely from state to state. In the statutes of limitation, a claimant must file a lawsuit within a given statutory duration of time. This is after suffering an injury due to a faulty product. Depending on the product, the statutory period can be between one to six years. Statutes of repose are not reliant on the period when a claimant is injured. Instead, a claimant must present his/her claim within a specified duration after the product is sold. Such statutes are not subjective to the discovery rule.
The learned intermediary doctrine is another defense that can be used during a product liability case. It is mostly used in the prescription drugs context. A manufacturer discharges all the responsibilities of drugs usage to the prescribing physician. This means that the manufacturer has no responsibilities of warning the users directly. Other minor defense claims can be based on the intervening or superseding cause, contributory negligence or comparative fault, assumption of the risk and state of the art (Kaplan and Strongman, 2010).
Critique of Products of Liability
Despite the protection and merits that the products of liability offer to the public, it is also subjectable to a critic. One such critic arises because both the purchasers and consumers of a product cannot sue a manufacturer of a seller for strict liability tort. This is in the case where the inherent danger that a product, like a gun or a knife, holds is general knowledge. In this case, manufacturers cannot be held responsible for a failure to warn consumers of the ordinary known dangers. In addition, they cannot be held responsible for scenarios where a consumer has modified a product and, in turn, causing an injury.
In the politics of product liability, a seller or manufacturer must be held accountable for any damages caused by the sale of a faulty product to a consumer. Different states have different product liability statutes. There are no federal statutes in the US governing product liability. The three forms of product defects in product liability claims include manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. The available defenses in such cases can be based on statutes of limitation, statutes of repose, learned intermediary doctrine, intervening or superseding cause, contributory negligence or comparative fault, the assumption of the risk and state of the art.
Strongman, H. K. (2010, January 05). United States: Developments In US Product Liability Law And The Issues Relevant To Foreign Manufacturers. Retrieved December 2015, from Mondaq: Connecting Knowledge and People: http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/89684/Product+Liability+Safety/Developments+In+US+Product+Liability+Law+And+The+Issues+Relevant+To+Foreign+Manufacturers
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal:
- How I Solved the Problem
- Total Quality Management on the Example of Superking Tyres Ltd.
- Understanding SWOT on the Shell Example
- Situation Leadership: Situational Impacts on Leader Ethical Decision-Making
- Essay Example on Operations Management
- Wal-Mart: The Everyday Low Price Problem
- The Walt Disney Company Company Profile
- Everyday Racism and Anti-racism
- Role of Women at Bletchley Park
- The Effect Wal-Mart Has on Small Businesses
- Poor Planning of DIA Baggage System
- Setting up a Non-Governmental Organization for Gender Equality
- Essay Sample on Pricing and Retailing Strategies
- Stress Management At Workplace - Narrative Essay Example
- MICE Portfolio in Singapore