Death penalty is considered a capital punishment given the fact that it involves the execution of the offender. This argument develops from the fact that it revolves around the issuing of a ruling that affects the offender directly. In this view, there is a development arising in the case that it spikes controversies around the world. Some people argue that there is need to support such a capital punishment given the case that it makes the victims feel very relieved. On the same note, there is the argument that such a punishment usually relives the family of the victim. In simple terms, many that support the capital punishment usually feel that it is a direct way of getting immediate revenge (Scherer 211). On the contrary, there are some people that feel the capital punishment has too much weight to bear. In this view, there uttermost reasoning is that the punishment should be eliminated completely from the judicial systems. Some an opposing group argue that death penalty is inhuman given the case that it violates the fundamental human rights. In light of such a viewpoint, these groups of people feel that there are many alternatives that could replace such a punishment.
There are many arguments that would trigger the debate given the case that the matter has both sides to analyze. Firstly, there is the argument against the capital punishment given the case that it does not serve as warning for murders. A good example that would support such reasoning develops in the case that there are increasing numbers of offenders that kill. This statement means that if the capital offense was effective, then there would be reduced cases of murders or violent criminal activity. Secondly, many people argue that when a criminal is convicted of first degree murder charges and consequently subjected to death penalty, there is no room for such people to change the course of their actions (Merino 176). This means that if the offenders would be subjected to longer jail terms, there would be the reasoning that these people would have the time to change and mediate on their course of action. A good point that supports such an intuition develops in the case that the judicial systems are meant to rehabilitate criminals so that they can be accepted into the society at a later stage.
In the event that such criminals are subjects of execution, there are minimal chances that such people would change and come back to the society. On the same grounds, there is the reasoning that such a measure would be rendered ineffective in the case that the judicial systems accept such kind of correctional measures. The case to argue in such a line of thought is that this kind of punishment would not actually serve as an example to other criminal offenders that would want to think in such line (Scherer 198). Instead, criminals would want to engage in the murder cases with defined decision given the case that they are fully aware of the ultimate punishment that waits them. On the same note, there is the intuition that death penalty is rewarding given the sense that they might have accomplished their mission. Additionally, there is the wrong impression that a country would portray to the rest of the world given the case that they decide to execute such criminals. Other considerations of the same argument include the fact that it has detrimental effects on the society given that the productive people would have been eliminated in the society. More importantly, families of the offenders would have to struggle with financial constraints eventually.
Arguments that develop in favor of the death penalty include the fact that it comforts the victims. A good point that further illustrates the functionality of such a capital offense revolves around the fact that when an offender is tried and subjected to imprisonment, there is the lacking factor that the person murdered will no longer exists in the world. In this view, there is the trauma that faces the families of the victim (Healey 187). As such, a judicial system that works towards implementing the death sentences works to comfort the families that would have lost their loved ones.
Conclusively, the debate on the capital punishment has various effects on the society. Firstly, it is considered effective in the case that it serves to satisfy the trial of the victim and consequently imply the law directly. Next, there is the intuition that when one is subjected to death penalty, the soul of the departed may rest in peace (victim). However, implementation such harsh judicial sentences usually have a detrimental effect to a given country given the case that it portrays a negative image of the country. For instance, there is mixed reaction from the general public given the case that it shows lack of honor to fundamental human rights. In this view, the decision to allow the death penalty administration within the judicial system is still a matter of discussion.
Scherer, Lauri. The Death Penalty. Detroit: Thomson/Gale, 2006. Print.
Merino, Noel. Death Penalty. , Farmington Hills: Greenhaven Press, 2015. Print.
Healey, Justin. The Death Penalty. Thirroul, N.S.W: The Spinney Press, 2010. Print.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal:
- The History of ISIS
- A Synthesis of Port Emission:Current Status and Future Directions
- Effects of Online Social Networking on Social Relationships
- Human Rights Issue in the US Foreign Policy Relationship with Cuba
- The Role of Women in the Family Today
- Paper Example on Child Poverty in China
- Letter on Nazi Party to the Editor of Avisa Relation Oder Zeitung