Advantages and Disadvantages of Historical Cost

Advantages of Historical Cost

If this sample essay on"Advantages and Disadvantages of Historical Cost" doesn’t help,
our writers will!

Trust an expert

Objectivity: It guarantees that the reports on the money-related position of the business are objective and can be confirmed by free narrative proof, for example, receipt, proclamation, check butt, receipt or voucher.

Effortlessness: It is a more straightforward financial strategy for resource valuation that does not require steady work, evaluating the changing current business sector estimations of benefits.

Moderate: Valuation of benefits by business sector quality would open up the choices for 'inventive bookkeeping' and the likelihood of administration misshaping the real consequences of the business.

Disadvantages of Historical Cost Basis:

1. There is no consideration of price level changes. Money-related proclamations arranged under authentic cost bookkeeping are simply an explanation of chronicled actualities. Variations in the estimation of cash as an aftereffect of changes the large level of cost are not considered.

2. Provision for depreciation is not accounted for. There is a deficit in the provision for depreciation on an asset. Without charge on the deterioration of an asset, it makes it inadequate for financial reporting purposes.

3. There is improbable profit. Salary articulation arranged under this basis cost bookkeeping does not uncover genuine benefit. Benefits are therefore over-expressed.

Advantages of Alternative Basis

1. Exact Valuation

The resource and risk valuation of an organization are accounted for money-related data. In cases where costs are required to build, the organization marks up the estimation of the benefit or obligation to its present business sector cost to reflect what it would get in the end.

2. Genuine Income

It ensures any price changes are accounted in the period in which they happen. While an expansion in resource esteem or a lessening of obligation esteem adds to net income, and, therefore, it reflects the exact income made in a period.

3. It presents a fair value of the financial position of an organization

Asset report shows the true worth money-related position. It takes into account the depreciation of an asset and any changes in the value

Disadvantages of Alternative Basis

It is a costly method. All the expenses and income gained by the business have to be traced, and that is costly. It also requires someone who has knowledge of the current methods of financial accounting and reporting.

Analysis based on IASBs two fundamental qualitative characteristics:

1. Relevance

The information used must be significant. Reporting primarily applicable data, or data whose oversight or misquote could affect the financial choices of clients.

Alternative Basis: They produce relevant results as they capture the monetary changes within different periods. With its Reasonable quality bookkeeping and reflection in the market prices, they are the most suitable method. As noted b IASB, the financial report should be relevant by the business standards.

Historical Cost: This basis produces results that are not pertinent to the business operations. Changes in the market prices of the assets are not considered. Additionally, it ignores the depreciation value of an asset.

2. Reliability, is the unwavering quality of the information given.

Alternative Basis: The data is free of serious mistakes and predisposition, and has no misdirection. The information provided here is reliable and speaks to changes and different occasions. It mirrors the essential substance of events, and wisely speaks to gauges and instabilities through appropriate exposure.

Historical Cost: In this bookkeeping, altered resources are recorded and introduced at the expense at which they were procured. Changes in the business sector estimation are overlooked and hence, they are not reliable.

3. The Most Appropriate Basis for Measurement

The alternative basis is, therefore, the most appropriate basis to apply in financial reporting. It is the most reliable method as it captures depreciation on assets. In Financial Accounting and Reporting book, (Elliot, 2008) noted that an alternative basis produces relevant results and the net income reported is true. He further notes that it ensures cost changes and risks are accounted for and reflects the actual financial position of an organization as opposed to the historical method.

Reference List

Elliott, B. and Elliott, J. (2008). Financial accounting and reporting. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.