A Price Elasticity of Demand
Inference: A price elasticity of demand for the product is -1.1898. It implies that a 1% increase in the product price will lead to a drop in the quantity demanded by 1.1898. The demand of the product of elastic. An increase in revenue may fail to attract a prospective customer.
Cross-Price elasticity of Demand (CED)
CED = Q/PX * (PX/Q)
CED = 20* 600/17,650
CED = 0.68
Inference: Increase in competitor price by 1% leads to an increase in the quantity demanded by 0.68%. The nature of demand for the product is relatively inelastic to competitors’ price and there is, therefore, no worry about the alternation of prices since it has negligible effects on the sales.
Income Elasticity of Demand (IED)
IED = Q/I * (Q/I)
IED = 5.2 * 5,500/17,650
IED = 1.6203
Inference: An income elasticity of demand of 1.6203 implies that an increase in the income by 1% leads to a consecutive increase in the quantity demanded by 1.6203%. The product possesses an elastic demand and the business can therefore increase the price once the average income increases.
Advertising Elasticity of Demand (AED)
AED = Q/A * (Q/A)
AED = 0.2 * 10,000/17,650
AED = 0.113
Inference: With an elasticity of 0.0753 an increase in the advertising expenditure by 1% leads to an increase in quantity demanded by 0.113%. The product has an inelastic demand since its elasticity is less than 1. Increasing the advertisement expenditure does not affect the price directly since it could still fail to attract demand.
Demand Elasticity of Microwaves
AED = Q/M * (Q/M)
AED = 0.25 * 5,000/17,650
AED = 0.071
As for the microwaves, the elasticity is 0.071. An increase in the price of the ovens by 1% leads to an increase in the number of microwave ovens demanded by 0.071 %. The demand for microwaves is inelastic and adopting a particular pricing strategy does not significantly affect the quantity demanded.
Recommendation.
Cutting down the price has the effect of increasing the quantity demanded since the price elasticity of the product is 1.1898 in absolute terms. The resultant effect would be the increase in the market share.
Option 2
QD = -2,000 - 100P + 15A + 25PX + 10I
P = 200 cents
A = $640
PX = 300 cents
I = $5,000
Solution
QD = -2,000 - 100P + 15A + 25PX + 10I
QD = -2,000 100(200) + 15(640) + 25(300) + 10(5,000)
QD = -2,000 20,000+ 9,600 + 7,500 + 50,000
QD = 45,100
Price Elasticity of Demand (PED)
Price Elasticity (Ep) = (P/Q) (Q/P)
From the regression equation:
Q/P = - 100
PED = - (-100) * 2/45,100
PED = 0.00443
The price elasticity of demand for the product is 0.00443. This implies that a 1% increase in the product price will lead to an increase in the quantity demanded by 0.00443. The demand of the product of inelastic.
Cross-Price elasticity of Demand (CED)
CED = Q/PX * (PX/Q)
CED = 25* 3/45,100
CED = 0.001663
Inference: Increase in competitor price by 1% leads to an increase in the quantity demanded by 0.001663%. The nature of demand for the product is relatively inelastic to competitors’ price and there is, therefore, no worry about the alternation of prices since it has negligible effects on the sales.
Income Elasticity of Demand (IED)
IED = Q/I * (Q/I)
IED = 10 * 5,000/45,100
IED = 1.1086
Inference: An income elasticity of demand of 1.1086 implies that an increase in the income by 1% leads to a consecutive increase in the quantity demanded by 1.1086%. The product possesses an elastic demand and the business can therefore increase the price once the average income increases.
Advertising Elasticity of Demand (AED)
AED = Q/A * (Q/A)
AED = 15* 640/45,100
AED = 0.2129
Inference: With an elasticity of 0.2129 an increase in the advertising expenditure by 1% leads to an increase in quantity demanded by 0.2129%. The product has an inelastic demand since its elasticity is less than 1. Increasing the advertisement expenditure does not affect the price directly since it could still fail to attract demand.
Recommendation
Cutting down the price has no effect of increasing the quantity demanded since the price elasticity of the product is negligible (0.00443). It would have no effect on the market share.
The Demand Curve for the Firm
With all factors held constant, the demand equation is as follows:
Option 1
QD = - 5200 - 42P + 20PX + 5.2I + 0.20A + 0.25M
P = 500 cents
PX = 600 cents
I = $5,500
A = $10,000
M = 5,000
QD = - 5200 - 42P + 20PX + 5.2I + 0.20A + 0.25M
QD = - 5200 42P + 20(600) + 5.2(5,500) + 0.20(10,000) + 0.25(5,000)
QD = - 5200 + 12,000 + 28,600 + 2,000 + 1,250 42P
QD = 38,650 42P
Option 2
QD = -2,000 - 100P + 15A + 25PX + 10I
P = 200 cents
A = $640
PX = 300 cents
I = $5,000
QD = -2,000 - 100P + 15A + 25PX + 10I
QD = -2,000 100(P) + 15(640) + 25(300) + 10(5,000)
QD = -2,000 100P+ 9,600 + 7,500 + 50,000
QD = 65,100 100P
Price ($) QD1 = 38,650 42P QD2 = 65,100 100P
100 34,450 55,100
200 30,250 45,100
300 26,050 35,100
400 21,850 25,100
500 17,650 15,100
600 13,450 5,100
Demand and Supply Function
Price ($) QD = 38,650 42P QD = 65,100 100P Supply
QD = -7,909.89 + 79.1P
100 34,450 55,100 0.11
200 30,250 45,100 7,910.11
300 26,050 35,100 15,820.11
400 21,850 25,100 23,730.11
500 17,650 15,100 31,640.11
600 13,450 5,100 39,550.11
6286501343024006286501447800
Determine the equilibrium price and quantity.
From the Graph:
Equilibrium (Quantity demanded = Quantity supplied)
Quantity: Option 1: 22,502.26
Quantity: Option 2: 24,312.35
Equilibrium Price
Option 1: 384.47 cents
Option 2: 407.8765 cents
Demand and Supply Factors
There is a possibility for the demand for low-calorie food to change in case of a change in the consumer income, competitors’ prices as well as the price of microwave ovens. The change takes place as a result of changes in consumer preferences such as attitudes towards low-calorie food. Consequently, the supply of the product can change in case of a change in the number of product suppliers, production technological advances in addition to other elements like labor and raw materials availability variations which have a direct influence on the product costs.
Supply and Demand Curve
Demand Curve
A shift of the demand curve to the right may be brought about by a decrease in the price for the complementary commodity such as the advertising the low-calorie food, increase in population, rise in preference for the product as well as the increase in consumer income.
A leftward shift of the demand curve, on the other hand, can be caused by a decline in consumer income, a recession as well an increase in the price of a complementary product.
Supply Curve
On the other hand, a shift of the supply curve to the right can arise out of an increase in the availability of cheap labor and raw materials, an increase in tax cuts and government subsidies as well as enhanced technological advances in food processing.
On the other hand, a leftward shift of the supply curve may result in a decrease in the availability or a surge in the price of labor and raw materials (inputs in production) as well as increased taxes.
References
Hall, R. E., & Lieberman, M. (2012). Microeconomics: Principles and applications. Cengage Learning.
Jiang, Q., Lee, Y. C., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2016). Price Elasticity in the Enterprise Computing Resource Market. IEEE Cloud Computing, 3(1), 24-31.
Rios, M. C., McConnell, C. R., & Brue, S. L. (2013). Economics: Principles, Problems, and policies. McGraw-Hill.
Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach: Ninth International Student Edition. WW Norton & Company.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SuperbGrade website, please click below to request its removal: